Friday, 21 November 2008 Subscribe to the Filmshi newsletter
Home arrow Reviews arrow Quality of Life




















Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184

Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184
Quality of Life
Contributed by Sara Schieron   
Friday, 14 October 2005

Trailer

Official Site

Showtimes

 
 
Director: Benjamin Morgan

Producer: Kevin Heverin, Darrell M. Lee, Benjamin Morgan, Meika Rouda, Brant Smith, Jennifer Stewart

Screenwriter: Brian Burnam, Benjamin Morgan

Stars: Lane Garrison, Brian Burnam

MPAA Rating: unrated

Year of Release: 2005 (limited)

A film review by Sara Schieron

Shot on Super 16, Quality of Life, tells the story of two graffiti artists in San Francisco's Mission District. Longtime friends Mike and Curtis spend their nights dodging police cars and spray painting art on (usually) public surfaces. By day, they paint houses, often covering up the work of other public painters. Written by Benjamin Morgan and the film's co-star Brian Burnam, Quality of Life explores the conflicts emerging from these character's involvement with this illegal art and the tensions that drive them towards and away from their medium of expression.

 

Found painting on what appear to be abandoned freight trucks, Mike (aka "Heir") and Curtis (aka "Vain") are penalized according to the "Quality of Life" statues that enforces the persecution of graffiti as a felony (along with drug trafficking, prostitution and vagrancy). After missing a week of work, Mike's father, the head of the house painting company, fires Curtis. Though Curtis is the  more defiant of the two, his involvement with a young single mother and her son make his rebellion seem particularly poignant: as compulsory as it is irresponsible. Much like the art they create, these characters comprise a study of the motivations that drive people to graffiti art. Mike's often played quote: "we paint graffiti, that's what we do", stands as a kind of anti-explanation for the work that drives them.

Formally, the film isn't far from other independent, verite revisions like Manito or Piecesof April, but this films constructs some gentle, almost expressionistic conventions that distinguish it from the pack. Careful focal distance is executed almost consistently - it's this degree of uncertainty that lends the out of focus moments their tension. Mike, the film's protagonist, is introduced in his bed: his slightly paint stained right hand, the only part of him in focus. When Mike fights with his loved ones, he's always a solid blur, and these fights end with his movement away into a wider haze.

The grain of the films, which is always palpable if even subtly, adds a fantastic dimension to the film's themes. Ideas such as impermanence, defiance, risk, and instability play out in sequences shot in varying degrees of low light where the grain, sometimes literally, overshadows the images. The seeming Rorschach of images plays into the expressive quality of the film. Moments of great intensity necessarily happen in the dark: painting in BART tunnels, hiding in alleys; hooded, these characters wait where the streetlight doesn't reach.

It can't be ignored the film has an incredible soundtrack. Music is a constant element and the songs, ranging from hip-hop to techno to modern, bleed together and work to portray the arcs of the characters as they form a sort of compendium storyline. Graffiti's ability to cross cultures like punk and hip hop make the film an easy play to a wide audience and this dexterity, which can be felt in every scene of the film, comes across loud and clear.

And EVERYTHING is available! The soundtrack, the dvd, and all kinds of merch.