Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184
Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184
Valerie Soe
Contributed by Sara Schieron
Thursday, 08 December 2005
So frequently, journals of film craft emphasize the process of
production. That is what they are there for, after all. However, in
their emphasis of the comedy and tragedy they can sometimes ignore the
seemingly less glamorous life of the film after the production ends.
The romance of struggle and the melodrama on the set, the tricks you
did that shouldn't have worked but ended up saving the picture: these
trials and tribulations are not only the stuff that makes films but
it's the stuff that films are made of.
On December 13, the Mayhem Film Festival will be holding it's 6th
annual screening. Curator Valerie Soe had a chat with me on the 9th at
the Liberty Café in Bernal Heights, where we discussed the modern
efficiency of self-distribution, the substance of exhibition and the
importance of film festivals.
What
made Southern Exposure, (a gallery in the Mission) decide to begin an
annual film screening?
They've had this annual fee-freed, juried exhibition every year for
several years and I think they decided to add a media arts component in
addition to their visual arts component so that film and video makers
could participate as well. Every year they pick a theme, this year's
theme is "Mayhem" and applicants have to make a piece that fits that
theme.
Is there a general submission emphasis for Mayhem Film Screening?
I think anything that fits into the yearly theme, as long as you can
convince the juror that your piece has to do with the theme, and a
juror likes it, that's all we require...and that it be under 15
minutes.
For the visual art component or the film component, you can only turn
in one piece per year.
How many films do you receive? How many do you accept?
I think this year I must have looked at 65 or 70 pieces. Luckily most
of them were a lot less than 15 minutes. And I think we took 8 or
9.
How many people work with you to organize the festival?
Two people at Southern Exposure were helping me out. They collected the
tapes, they took care of all of the logistics, and they made a list of
all the applicants. I looked at the films and made my lists for it as
well. I also think we have a few people helping on the night of the
screening, to take care of whatever goals we might need to care for
that night.
What are the goals of the festival?
I think to get as broad a range (as possible) of people who are making
work in the Bay Area...and to get as many endless variations on the
theme
as we can. To have some limitations, but still be as open as
possible.
Why did you hold your screening at the Red Vic?
The Red Vic has been around for years and years and years and it
started as some kind of hippie compound. In the spirit of artist run
collectives, I think Southern Exposure, an artist run organization
itself, picked the Red Vic. Southern Exposure is a non-profit that
serves the artist community and so I think that there was sort of a
parallel in philosophies with the Red Vic. Plus it's centrally located,
they have a regular clientele, and that really great popcorn with the
yeast on it.
I think it's interesting you would choose to screen so far outside of
your gallery.
You know, I'm not sure why they decided to go out of the mission.
Sometimes it's just about the availability of screening venues.
Certainly the Roxie is much closer but they probably book way in
advance and they have a certain thing they want to do. In some cases it
just comes down to availability.
This is the festival's 6th year, has it been a consistent run?
I think so. There's a lot of film and video artist out there who always
want to show their stuff. So you can always find people interested in
showing their work.
What do you think makes a successful screening?
I think, work that surprises you, as far as the theme is concerned,
but, at the same time, still has cohesion with the whole screening.
There were a few films that I absolutely loved but didn't make sense
for the topic. They were completely off topic and I wasn't sure why
they sent them in but I really liked them and just couldn't squeeze
them into the framework of Mayhem. Having some kind of vision or flow
is a good thing but the screening can't be repetitious. So I have to
find a balance between work that has some kind of variety and yet has
cohesion as a unit.
Are your applicants largely amateur or professional?
That's a funny way to put it. I don't know if these people are
professionals or amateurs. I know there are a lot of students; most
people can't make a living making the kinds of films that get screened
at this show. But I think that a lot of these people have track
records. I think they've been shown in the past and there are some
people who haven't but it's all-okay.
That is a better way to put it: Track Record. What resources do you
rely upon to make this festival a successful one?
Like I said, the Bay Area is really great because there are so many
people working here in media: either new Media or digital technology,
multimedia or straight up analogue film/celluloid. There are still a
lot of people working in celluloid, 16mm and 8mm film. There's a lot of
community in the area because there are people here who make film. You
can always get a lot of people to submit. And likewise, you can always
get a lot of people to come to the shows because people are prime to
this kind of stuff. They're not just raised on Hollywood movies in the
Bay Area. There are so many venues: The Roxie, The Red Vic, The Castro,
The Balboa all these movie theatres that all these great pictures like
indie features. Plus all these places like the San Francisco
Cinemateque, Other Cinema, Artist Television Access, Film Arts. And
then, how many film festivals are there in this town? It seems every
time you turn around there's another film festival. So we've got these
audiences who are very educated and want to come and watch movies that
are not your basic Hollywood movie. So we have much more open-minded
clientele. And that's probably the biggest thing about San Francisco
and the resources you can draw in: you can get people who want to watch
this stuff and you don't have to show it in someone's garage. You can
get real movie theatres, like the Red Vic, to show it and you can even
fill up a house.
The Press is really good here, too. The Bay Guardian is really great,
as far as reviewing independent film. There are all kinds of various
websites and blogs. There's a great network of people who watch
independent or experimental movies or off beat stuff and those are
really great resources.
This may be on or off the record. What kind of future do you think
these films have in the area? You expressed that we have a network that
can facilitate repeat access to these film and an audience that want to
go see them. What other venues does this variety of screening lead to?
Usually that's how these curatorial screenings function, where they are
preliminary access and then other people see them in other screenings,
theatres pick them up, that sort of thing.
Any time you have a screening and you have a record of that screening,
even if it's just a little brochure that record gets sent around. Or
record of the screening will be up on the website and people will
access it and go to find the rest of the films in a particular
screening and then seek out one video from the group. So it's not
necessarily a one-night thing anymore. I know that Southern Exposure
makes a master copy of the screening. I don't know if they have plans
for distributing it but you can certainly contact the filmmakers
easily. Again, because of he web, everybody can research anybody's name
or work. So self-distribution is a lot more efficient these days
because of the Internet so I hope that others will see these films and
seek them out online. A couple of these films I had seen at
other
film festivals so I didn't have to see them again, I knew I already
liked them. I had them on a DVD from the Film Arts Festival and I had
watched that. So they're making the rounds. These films make the
rounds, even more than they could have 10 years ago, when people were
not so able to connect as they are now.
It sounds as though you're involved in a festival network and that
festival network supports the curatorial work you do for Southern
Exposure.
There's a lot of sharing in the Bay Area. There are a lot of people
interested in independent or experimental film or whatever you want to
call it. I was just thinking about how different that is from Los
Angeles, where everyone is so competitive, you don't share anything
with each other. Part of that is because in San Francisco you can't
become rich and famous by being a filmmaker so maybe your less
compelled as far as keeping things close to the vest. I think that
helps a lot and people are fairly open about talking to each
other.
What roll does press play in getting buzz around your screening and
what does the coverage following the festival do to boost the work of
the filmmakers?
I know that Southern Exposure has a really traditional
mailing
list with paper and postage and so forth but I suspect they reach more
people through their email list. That's the usual way I get word out to
everybody too. I sent out an email to everyone on my spam list that I
curated a show and it saves on postage and time and it's fast and easy
and people look at it. I don't know why. I think you just have to hit
all the aspects: somebody told me it was called the three-drip theory
of marketing. You have to hit people three times. So if they hear it on
the radio and then see a flier and then read it on the Internet, then
it finally starts to sink into their brain. I had a person who had this
three-drip theory and first she'd plaster fliers up all around the
theatre; then she'd try to get on the radio, which she did pretty
successfully; and then she'd pester the newspapers and send out press
releases and then is when it hits people. Because if you hear it one
time you don't necessarily pay attention but if you hear it more than
once something in your subconscious brain picks it up. In some ways
it's more complex these days and in other ways it's simpler to do this
sort of self-promotion.
Have filmmaker's web sites factored into your process at all? For
example, if you're interested in a film and you feel, in one way or
another, is inaccessible, you can go online and find something about
it.
I think anytime you have some kind of literature up on the web or you
need to google someone and see what else they've done, it's always nice
to have more background. You used to have all these reams of paper
people would send with their submissions and it was like "aw man"
because who wants to read that? Now you can go to people's websites and
see what they've done and it's a lot tidier.
What mistakes have you made that you and others can learn from?
Mistakes? I usually start to watch the movies late at night because
that's when I have spare time. And you know, sometimes, when you are
tired and you start to watch things that are... abstract, you start to
fall asleep. So don't watch abstract films too late at night. Have a
cup of coffee or do it in the morning, otherwise you might not make
it.
What magical moments have you had that make you want to do it
again?
It's always fun that night. It's a lot of work to get everything
together and to get people there but there is still no substitute for
having a huge group of people together to watch something. I'm a big
fan of watching things in a theatre. Even though I have the DVD, it's
so much more fun. You get your big thing of popcorn and you sit with
all these people and it's some kind of collective experience.
A yeasty collective experience?
Yeah! Human beings like that, they need that. Must be sort of like why
people go to church. I don't go to church but I go to movies.
What kind of selections do you have this year? Are there any pictures
we should keep our eyes out for?
I tried to get as much of a range as I could, within theme of course.
One of them is an animation by Sarah Cohen, and it's based on the theme
of Mayhem - really simple - of a woman going through her everyday
chores. But then she does some really strange things like put a hand
grenade in a microwave. It's very matter of fact and it's hand drawn
and hand animated and low tech. Kind of cool. And then the other end of
the spectrum in terms of technology, there a film called Aluminum by
Tyrone Davies and that's only 3 minutes long but it's got thousands of
images. He took sound and footage from what looks like TV or news of
apparently what looks like footage from Iraq and he edited it together
really, really fast. He has this really great soundtrack and at one
point you see a can of coca-cola being shot out of a rocket launcher
and I'm not sure if he composited that or if it's something he found on
TV but it happens in like a third of a second and it goes by almost too
fast to comprehend. It's sort of like those impressionist paintings
that are made of dots and you have to back away to see the picture,
because if you don't back away you can't see what's going on.
How long do you hope to hold Mayhem?
I think Southern Exposure will do it every year. I don't know if I'll
get to curate it next year because I did it this year, but I've been
involved with Southern Exposure for years and years. I used to be on
their visual arts committee and I actually showed there a couple of
times. They're really good about bringing back people who are in their
"fold" as it were. They're artist based so they always want people to
come in and participate.
How do you feel that being involved with these festivals affects your
film work?
It's good for me because I get to see what other people are doing...see
the visual trends. Some of these filmmakers are a lot younger than me
so they're up on top of what the new special effects are. It's always
good to watch what they're doing. Not necessarily imitate them but be
inspired by them.
Have you met incredible people?
There are a lot of cool people in San Francisco.
So there's a reason for the network, it's not just because people need
to keep making movies?
No, I think that the people who live here want to have fun and they
want life to be neat. Quality of life is so important.
Thank you so much for speaking with me today, I hope this chat will be
as informative to the audience as it has been for me. Again, the
screening is at the Red Vic on the 13th of December. And on behalf of
Filmshi, I wish you success on your 6th year of Mayhem! May it persist
and endure.