Monday, 05 January 2009 Subscribe to the Filmshi newsletter
Home arrow Festivals arrow Berlin & Beyond arrow Panel on Resistance in Film




















Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184

Notice: Can't open file: 'mos_core_log_items.MYD'. (errno: 145) in /home/httpd/vhosts/filmshi.com/httpdocs/db/includes/database.php on line 184
Panel on Resistance in Film
Contributed by Sara Schieron   
Tuesday, 17 January 2006
 
There is a German Proverb that reads: "As fast as laws are devised, their evasion is contrived". So appropriate is that proverb in light of today's panel discussion on the issue of Resistance in Film.

Put on by the Goethe Institute as part of it Berlin & Beyond film festival, this panel was moderated in the Goethe Institute's Auditorium at 530 Bush Street, and boasted standing room only attendance. Manned (and womanned) by notable directors, this panel included the filmmaker receiving the festival's lifetime achievement award, Michael Verhoeven, Marc Rothemund, director of the festival's opening night film and German Oscar sensation SOPHIE SCHOLL: THE FINAL DAYS, Ben Heisenberg, director of this year's "Best 1st Feature Award" NETTO and Berkeley based documentarian Deborah Kaufman, director of THIRST, BLACKS AND JEWS and SECRETS OF SILICON VALLEY.
 
Emphasizing the role of the activist in resistance, Verhoeven said, "Resistance is about having a strong sense of self and a strong sense of your surroundings." Rothmund added to this, "I feel it's the people who love life that are not afraid to give theirs up for others." But not all of the filmmakers on the panel dealt with the act of resistance as an act of unobstructed heroism. Some, particularly Kaufman, took to discussing the issue of resistance as an action either "acceptable" or "unacceptable" to capture or broadcast. "If we look at the work of Michael Moore, who is our most recognized activist filmmaker, and then compare that to a narrative film like Ang Lee's BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, we can see the effects of film as a mode of resistance. Lee's film mostly relies on the engagement of the audience to make its message. While BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN isn't a film about resistance, it accomplishes a lot of the same goals and may ultimately effect greater change because of this engagement with its audience." Making note of the bans of BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN from theatres in Utah, she commented upon the film's ability to tap into this "acceptable resistance", as well as the way this brand of resistance plays out in documentary film. The need to acquire distribution is always a pressing issue to filmmakers as the life of the film depends upon it. To draw distribution, a documentary's capacity to salaciously capture sensational "real life" resistance is a trait that filmmakers must yield to in order to attract the attention they require to draw audiences. "We've all seen the image of the student standing in front of the tank in Tiananmen Square," Kaufman said, "but what we haven't seen is the image of Rachel Quarry standing in front of a tank, demonstrating against house demolitions in Guiza. Perhaps we haven't seen that picture because it's appropriate resistance."

Relating to the issue of appropriateness, I asked a question about the restrictions of film form on storytelling and character, and whether those restrictions hinder or benefit the goals of resistance. "Necessarily", I said, "characters undergo some mythologizing or romanticizing in the process of being depicted. How much mythologizing do you think happens in stories of resistance and do you feel such mythologizing undermines the goals of resistance?"

Shamefully, I immediately felt that I offended Marc Rothemund. Having used an example of such mythologizing from his film SOPHIE SCHOLL: THE FINAL DAYS, I may have appeared to direct my question to him. Sensing this, he responded that he had no intention of mythologizing his protagonist Sophie Scholl. His goal was to bring to light new historical evidence. So, though he was avoiding mythologizing, I felt he did represent Sophie Scholl as a heroin. She's a martyr after all, and any film dedicated to the story of a woman unjustly punished is simply bound to depict a heroin. By the rules of form alone this should be the case. Rothemund said, "The structure of filmmaking tends towards the heroic model. The critics in Germany said that the sunlight in my film was ridiculous and that one man can't overturn the government." And Kaufman added: But the idea of being heroic in a situation like the Third Reich is double pronged: Hitler is singular and demonized and the problem calls for a single hero to take him down."

Appealing to this, Ben Heisenberg, winner of the Best 1st Feature award at the fest, added, "I would think that to create a film that was completely resistant, the form would have to resist emotionalizing. I would think the form would have to be resistant as well as the content." To which Verhoeven added, "In France if you make a film that's hard to watch, a million people attend. If you show that film in Germany, ten thousand come." And finally, Kaufman, bridging the gap, said, "It's the Sword of Damocles in Film. Who will distribute the film and who will come to see it." In the end, if the film isn't seen, the seeds of resistance can't be spread.

Asserting once again, the motive for the agenda of resistance, Rothemund chimed in. "Resistance is also the resistance to passivity. Resistance happens in one person too, when that person resists laziness." To which Heisenberg included, "one can also resist in the manner of Gorbachev. He worked his way into a powerful, political role and once he was in the center, he began changing things." But the veteran of the group sounded the final bell. Verhoeven, identifying part of the goal of resistance as an historical model said, "When I was going to school, there was never any talk of resistance. And when the Gestapo recorded all of the acts of resistance, there were thousands of acts during the Reich, of people resisting the Reich. The Gestapo didn't write the acts down to persecute, only to know what the people were doing. Why didn't we talk about that in school? It would have made all of us feel so much better."